Frontier in Medical & Health Research
ANATOMICAL RISK FACTORS ASSESSMENT ON ORTHOPANTOMOGRAM AND CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF LOWER THIRD MOLAR IMPACTIONS
PDF

Keywords

Impacted mandibular third molar; Orthopantomogram; Cone beam computed tomography; Inferior alveolar canal; Impacted tooth; Surgical risk assessment.

How to Cite

ANATOMICAL RISK FACTORS ASSESSMENT ON ORTHOPANTOMOGRAM AND CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR SURGICAL REMOVAL OF LOWER THIRD MOLAR IMPACTIONS. (2025). Frontier in Medical and Health Research, 3(5), 2589-2598. https://fmhr.net/index.php/fmhr/article/view/3713

Abstract

Objective: To  evaluate  anatomical  risk  factors  associated  with  impacted mandibular  third  molars  using orthopantomogram  (OPG)  and  cone  beam computed  tomography  (CBCT),  and  to  determine  the  correlation  between panoramic   radiographic   signs   and   CBCT-defined   high-risk   anatomical relationships.Materials  and  Methods: This  cross-sectional  study  was  conducted  at  the Department  of  Oral  and  Maxillofacial  Surgery,  MTI–Khyber  College  of Dentistry, Peshawar, over 12 months. A total of 180 impacted mandibular third molars from patients aged ≥18 years who underwent both OPG and CBCT were included.  Panoramic  radiographs  were  assessed  for  classical  radiographic  signs indicating proximity to the inferior alveolar canal, while CBCT scans evaluated canal position, cortical integrity, and root–canal relationship. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.Results:The mean age of patients was 27.99 ± 6.33 years, with slight male predominance.   Mesioangular   impaction   was   the   most   common   pattern. Darkening of roots was the most frequent panoramic sign. CBCT demonstrated a high-risk anatomical relationship in 45% of cases. Among panoramic findings, narrowing of  the  inferior  alveolar  canal  showed  a significant  association  with high-risk  CBCT  findings and  was  identified  as  an  independent predictor  on  logistic  regression  analysis.  However,  its  diagnostic  accuracy remained low.Conclusion: Panoramic radiographic findings alone are insufficient for reliable prediction  of  high-risk  anatomical  relationships  between  impacted  mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar canal. CBCT provides superior anatomical assessment  and  should  be  selectively  used  in  cases  with  suspicious  panoramic findings  to  improve  surgical  planning  and  reduce  the  risk  of  inferior  alveolar nerve injury.

PDF